NPR’s Leila Fadel speaks with Lawyer Normal Kris Mayes, a Democrat who has vowed to not implement a sweeping abortion ban upheld by the state’s supreme courtroom.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
We go to Arizona, the place a Civil Struggle period ban on virtually all abortions will quickly be the regulation after a ruling this week by the state’s Supreme Courtroom. Arizona justices revived an 1864 regulation barring all abortions besides in instances the place the mom’s life is in danger. It will change the earlier state regulation that allowed abortion by means of 15 weeks of being pregnant, and there could be no exceptions for rape or incest. It is the most recent state ban on abortion for the reason that U.S. Supreme Courtroom reversed Roe v. Wade almost two years in the past, and the state’s lawyer basic says she won’t implement it. Arizona Lawyer Normal Kris Mayes is right here with me now. Good morning.
KRIS MAYES: Good morning.
FADEL: So that you say you are not going to implement this regulation. Why?
MAYES: Nicely, for quite a few causes, we can’t be imposing this regulation. In the beginning, it’s unconstitutional. It violates our state’s proper to privateness, which is expressly written into our Structure. Secondly, you understand, this is not over by an extended shot. We nonetheless have a chance over the following 60 days to attempt to get this horrible choice reversed. It would not take impact instantly. So we now have anyplace from 45 to 60 days to attempt to cease this. This factor was handed or written when Arizona wasn’t even a state, girls could not vote and the Civil Struggle was nonetheless raging.
FADEL: However your job, finally, is to implement regulation. So if it does take impact in 45 to 60 days, do you threat your elected place by selecting to not implement it?
MAYES: No. Positively not. Look, there are legal guidelines on the books in Arizona and in each state that aren’t enforced. I imply, Arizona has an adultery regulation, a bigamy regulation. These legal guidelines should not enforced. And it is my job to guarantee that the assets of my workplace are correctly utilized and spent. And I even have supervisory authority over the state’s 15 county attorneys. And I’ve made it clear that if any of them makes an attempt to prosecute a health care provider or a nurse, a medical skilled or a lady below this insane, egregious 1864 abortion ban, that I’ll step in and I’ll cease them, or no less than try to cease them.
FADEL: You stated that this was a seismic choice. I believe this modifications every part. While you say this modifications every part, what does it change?
MAYES: Nicely, clearly it modifications every part in a horrible method for Arizona girls and households. However from a political standpoint, that is an absolute earthquake. This can be a 8.0 on the Richter scale. You understand, the Republicans do not know what’s coming at them in November. You understand, the individuals of Arizona – as they need to by means of the democratic course of – will make it clear that they do not need to be subjected to an 1864 abortion ban. And so I believe what meaning is that the poll initiative that we now have is probably going, virtually definitely, I imagine, to move.
FADEL: And that is a poll initiative come November that may enshrine the precise to abortion within the Structure.
MAYES: Precisely.
FADEL: Now, we have seen some Republicans, although, criticizing this ruling, saying it went too far, that it is too excessive – Republican lawmaker David Prepare dinner from Arizona saying it must be modified – even criticized by Kari Lake, who ran for Arizona governor on an anti-abortion platform. And what do you make of those criticisms? Is that this a shift?
MAYES: I believe what you hear within the voices of these Republicans is worry. And it is worry of the truth that the individuals of Arizona are going to resoundingly reject this within the type of their votes in November. And, you understand, I admire the truth that there are just a few Republicans who’re prepared to say that, however they definitely ought to have and will have stated that a very long time in the past. They may have repealed this at any time over the previous a long time, I suppose. And so they definitely may have repealed it within the final 12 months, however they selected to not. So what I say to them is, a bit of too little and a bit of too late.
FADEL: Arizona Lawyer Normal Kris Mayes, thanks for becoming a member of us.
MAYES: Thanks.
Copyright © 2024 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content will not be in its remaining type and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might range. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.
