We’ve all seen the memes of riders who spend their total saddle time staring down at their pc items relatively than the world round them. However is info energy (because the saying goes), or can an excessive amount of information or suggestions be damaging to efficiency to aggressive cyclists?
Essentially the most well-known stem starer
Stem Staring
Rightly or wrongly, Chris Froome was the poster boy for memes about riders observing their stems or bike computer systems, resulting in all kinds of debate about robotic racing and concepts about banning energy meters. Froome truly claims it’s his pure physique alignment and posture on the bike relatively than an obsession with information.
In lab experiments, we typically have individuals carry out time trials with none suggestions (energy, distance, HR, cadence, and so forth.), as we need to see their pure pacing technique. In monitor racing, you’re allowed to file information, however the pc needs to be hidden out of view. Off the boards, we’ll virtually all the time know the space of the race, and our computer systems give us entry to a virtually infinite array of potential information.
So what is perfect? If we need to nail our membership time trial, ought to we go the monitor or the highway route? If the latter, how a lot data is an excessive amount of data?
I beforehand wrote a couple of 2017 examine about simply what information factors skilled and non-experienced cyclists deal with.
Bayne et al. 2020
Having a single versus a number of information suggestions accessible throughout time trials was the main target of a UK/Qatari examine (Bayne et al. 2020). In addition they examined the results of suggestions on skilled versus inexperienced cyclists. Listed below are the primary experimental particulars.
- 10 skilled cyclists (> 2 years of biking or triathlon competitors) and 10 match (> 5 h of exercise per week) non-cyclists.
- A 30 min lab time trial was the take a look at, with the aim of highest common energy or work executed throughout this time. Check was executed in 18°C with a slight wind.
- The only suggestions situation was elapsed time.
- The a number of suggestions consisted of time, distance, pace, cadence, watts, and coronary heart fee.
- Eye monitoring software program was used to see how lengthy individuals checked out totally different information factors.
The Eyes Have It
An attention-grabbing query executed with an acceptable and simple analysis design.
As seen within the backside graph of this determine, all teams (CTMF = Cyclists, a number of suggestions; CTSF = Single suggestions; NCMF = Non-cyclists), had related pacing methods no matter expertise or suggestions amount. For the non-cyclists, single or a number of suggestions had no impact on efficiency, with common wattage 131 and 137 W with single and a number of suggestions, respectively. This is able to recommend that information availability was secondary to pure health and expertise.
The skilled cyclists introduced fairly a distinct response to suggestions, nonetheless. With single suggestions, their common energy was 288 W. Nonetheless, with a number of suggestions, there was an enormous drop right down to 228 W, regardless of related rankings of perceived exertion. This is able to recommend that the presence of a lot suggestions led to info overload and distraction from the duty at hand.
Diving deeper into the attention monitoring information, it’s not stunning that the cyclists glanced most frequently and in addition spent probably the most time glancing at energy, regardless that their notion was that they glanced most at pace. One different attention-grabbing remark was that the overall period of time glancing at information decreased over the 30 min time trial. This might recommend a shift to specializing in inner cues over time, or doubtlessly cognitive fatigue from info overload.
Watch the place you’re going
Eyes on the Highway!
Primarily based on this examine, the recommendation for time trials and possibly even climbing or KOM-hunting could also be to simplify your pc display. Follow one (e.g., energy, common energy, cadence) or at most two metrics (e.g., add in time, distance or distance-to-go).
I can’t conclude this examine with no warning. This was executed within the lab on a stationary bike. Out on the highway, hold your eyes up and alert!
Simplify your life. Go minimalist and go quick!
References
Bayne F, Racinais S, Mileva Ok, et al (2020) Much less Is Extra—Cyclists-Triathlete’s 30 min Biking Time-Trial Efficiency Is Impaired With A number of Suggestions In comparison with a Single Suggestions. Entrance Psychol 11:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608426
Like PEZ? Why not subscribe to our weekly e-newsletter to obtain updates and reminders on what’s cool in highway biking?
